Evidence-based dentistry · 2025
Dentures and the oral microbiome: Unraveling the hidden impact on edentulous and partially edentulous patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Madhan Kumar Seenivasan, Natarajan Shanmuganathan, Ks Sridharan, Sundarajan Senthil Kumar, Natarajan Parthasarathy, Arockiam A Selva
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of edentulism and denture use on the oral microbiome, focusing on microbial diversity, colonization and biofilm formation in completely and partially edentulous patients.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs, and Google Scholar) until June 1, 2024. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and cohort studies were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA and R software with a random effects maximum likelihood model. Microbial co-occurrence networks, heatmaps, and longitudinal trends were analyzed, with heterogeneity assessed using Higgin's I² (substantial heterogeneity defined as I² > 50%).
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The oral microbiome in edentulous patients differed significantly from dentate individuals, influenced by denture materials, design, and time. Veillonella abundance in acrylic complete dentures was 13.63% (95% CI = -0.04, 27.29), I² = 90.98%, compared to 49.10% (95% CI = -29.62, 115.81), I² = 99.47% in dentate patients. Candida albicans increased over time in acrylic dentures, from 63.13% (95% CI = 48.93, 77.33), I² = 99.84% after insertion to 344.72 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 139.19, 550.24), I² = 98.30% at nine months. Streptococcus mutans in CAD/CAM dentures increased from 45.54 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 33.82, 57.25), I² = 87.26% at three months to 125.22 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 38.25, 212.18), I² = 97.89% at nine months. Co-occurrence networks revealed strong Candida albicans-Streptococcus mutans synergy, while Fusobacterium nucleatum showed antagonistic interactions. Heatmaps demonstrated microbial dysbiosis in denture stomatitis cases, with increased Porphyromonas gingivalis and Candida albicans and reduced commensals. Longitudinal analyses highlighted the progressive dominance of opportunistic pathogens, emphasizing the need for early and consistent hygiene interventions.
CONCLUSION: Denture wearers exhibit distinct microbial communities influenced by biofilm formation, denture materials, and hygiene practices. Findings highlight the importance of antimicrobial denture materials and effective cleaning protocols in managing microbial colonization. Given high heterogeneity, standardized methodologies are essential for future research. Frequent professional cleaning and individualized hygiene strategies are necessary to prevent denture-associated infections and maintain oral health.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs, and Google Scholar) until June 1, 2024. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and cohort studies were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA and R software with a random effects maximum likelihood model. Microbial co-occurrence networks, heatmaps, and longitudinal trends were analyzed, with heterogeneity assessed using Higgin's I² (substantial heterogeneity defined as I² > 50%).
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The oral microbiome in edentulous patients differed significantly from dentate individuals, influenced by denture materials, design, and time. Veillonella abundance in acrylic complete dentures was 13.63% (95% CI = -0.04, 27.29), I² = 90.98%, compared to 49.10% (95% CI = -29.62, 115.81), I² = 99.47% in dentate patients. Candida albicans increased over time in acrylic dentures, from 63.13% (95% CI = 48.93, 77.33), I² = 99.84% after insertion to 344.72 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 139.19, 550.24), I² = 98.30% at nine months. Streptococcus mutans in CAD/CAM dentures increased from 45.54 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 33.82, 57.25), I² = 87.26% at three months to 125.22 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 38.25, 212.18), I² = 97.89% at nine months. Co-occurrence networks revealed strong Candida albicans-Streptococcus mutans synergy, while Fusobacterium nucleatum showed antagonistic interactions. Heatmaps demonstrated microbial dysbiosis in denture stomatitis cases, with increased Porphyromonas gingivalis and Candida albicans and reduced commensals. Longitudinal analyses highlighted the progressive dominance of opportunistic pathogens, emphasizing the need for early and consistent hygiene interventions.
CONCLUSION: Denture wearers exhibit distinct microbial communities influenced by biofilm formation, denture materials, and hygiene practices. Findings highlight the importance of antimicrobial denture materials and effective cleaning protocols in managing microbial colonization. Given high heterogeneity, standardized methodologies are essential for future research. Frequent professional cleaning and individualized hygiene strategies are necessary to prevent denture-associated infections and maintain oral health.