MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105960

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of fluency disorders · 2023

Listener perceptions of stuttering and stuttering modification techniques.

De Nardo Thales, Tetnowski John A, Coalson Geoffrey A

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse naïve listener perceptions of speech containing unmodified stuttering, use of the pull-out technique, and use of preparatory-sets.

METHOD: Participants (N = 62) were randomly assigned to listen to one audio sample (unmodified stuttered speech, speech with pull-outs, or speech with preparatory-sets) and completed a survey assessing perceptions of the speaker's speech and personality and the listener's comfort level and willingness to social interact with the speaker.

RESULTS

Survey results revealed low perceptual ratings in all experimental conditions. Unmodified stuttered speech received significantly more positive ratings than the stuttering modification conditions in all measurements except for speech naturalness. Listeners reported being less willing to socially interact with those who use preparatory-sets than unmodified stuttered speech.

CONCLUSION

The use of stuttering modification techniques did not improve listeners' perceptions or willingness to interact with persons who stutter. Clinicians and those who stutter should be aware that the use of speech techniques will not decrease negative social interactions or stereotypes.

Для цитирования: De Nardo Thales, Tetnowski John A, Coalson Geoffrey A. Listener perceptions of stuttering and stuttering modification techniques.. Journal of fluency disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105960.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.