Frontiers in psychology · 2025
The role of healthy personality, psychological flexibility, and coping mechanisms in university students' mental health in China.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Xiao, Ilias Kartini, Anuar Md Isa Khairil, Li Qing-Hong, Wang Hai-Bin, Li Huan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mental health issues such as anxiety and depression have become increasingly common among Chinese university students, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explores the relationships between personality health, psychological flexibility, coping styles, and mental health in this population.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 2,528 university students (aged 18-25, 53.26% male). Personality was assessed using the MMPI, psychological flexibility via the AAQ and CFQ-F, and coping styles using the SCSQ. Mental health outcomes were gathered as part of a university-wide assessment.
RESULTS: After controlling for demographic variables, personality health, psychological flexibility, and coping styles were significantly associated with mental health. Psychological flexibility showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.454-0.660, p < 0.001). The final multivariate model, including psychological flexibility and coping styles, explained a moderate portion of variance in mental health (Adjusted R 2 = 0.4892, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Psychological flexibility and adaptive coping strategies play a key role in promoting mental health among university students. Targeted interventions in these areas-such as integrating them into university curricula and support programs-can help mitigate anxiety and depression. Though based on a Chinese sample, the findings align with global research, highlighting the cross-cultural relevance of psychological flexibility in mental health interventions.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 2,528 university students (aged 18-25, 53.26% male). Personality was assessed using the MMPI, psychological flexibility via the AAQ and CFQ-F, and coping styles using the SCSQ. Mental health outcomes were gathered as part of a university-wide assessment.
RESULTS: After controlling for demographic variables, personality health, psychological flexibility, and coping styles were significantly associated with mental health. Psychological flexibility showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.454-0.660, p < 0.001). The final multivariate model, including psychological flexibility and coping styles, explained a moderate portion of variance in mental health (Adjusted R 2 = 0.4892, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Psychological flexibility and adaptive coping strategies play a key role in promoting mental health among university students. Targeted interventions in these areas-such as integrating them into university curricula and support programs-can help mitigate anxiety and depression. Though based on a Chinese sample, the findings align with global research, highlighting the cross-cultural relevance of psychological flexibility in mental health interventions.