Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022
Alveolar bone response distal to applied orthodontic forces in ovariectomized rats.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsolakis Apostolos I, Khaldi Lubna, Rontogianni Aliki, Georgaki Maria, Christopoulou Isidora, Dontas Ismene A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the application of orthodontic tooth forces on the alveolar bone distal to the loaded teeth, in ovariectomized female rats.
METHODS: Twenty-four eight-month-old Wistar rats were divided into one group ovariectomized at the age of six months and one control. An orthodontic appliance delivering a mesial traction force of 60 gr* was placed on the right maxillary 1st molar of all animals for 14 days. Histology of the alveolar bone, of the adjacent and distal teeth to the loaded molar and the contralateral side, was performed following euthanasia.
RESULTS: In the non-ovariectomized rats, extensive resorption was noticed in the direction of the orthodontic movement in the 2nd and 3rd molar interdental space, whereas the respective contralateral interdental space did not show any remodeling activity. Ovariectomized rats displayed reduced osseous tissue in the interdental space of both sides. The alveolar bone in the interradicular area of the 2nd loaded molar revealed frontal resorption, whereas, the alveolar interradicular bone of the contralateral 2nd molar showed internal resorption.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, orthodontic forces applied to the dentoalveolar complex of ovariectomized rats affect bone remodeling, even in areas distal to the site of force application. This finding should be taken into account during orthodontic treatment of women during menopause.
METHODS: Twenty-four eight-month-old Wistar rats were divided into one group ovariectomized at the age of six months and one control. An orthodontic appliance delivering a mesial traction force of 60 gr* was placed on the right maxillary 1st molar of all animals for 14 days. Histology of the alveolar bone, of the adjacent and distal teeth to the loaded molar and the contralateral side, was performed following euthanasia.
RESULTS: In the non-ovariectomized rats, extensive resorption was noticed in the direction of the orthodontic movement in the 2nd and 3rd molar interdental space, whereas the respective contralateral interdental space did not show any remodeling activity. Ovariectomized rats displayed reduced osseous tissue in the interdental space of both sides. The alveolar bone in the interradicular area of the 2nd loaded molar revealed frontal resorption, whereas, the alveolar interradicular bone of the contralateral 2nd molar showed internal resorption.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, orthodontic forces applied to the dentoalveolar complex of ovariectomized rats affect bone remodeling, even in areas distal to the site of force application. This finding should be taken into account during orthodontic treatment of women during menopause.