Clinical chemistry · 2003
HER-2/neu gene copy number quantified by real-time PCR: comparison of gene amplification, heterozygosity, and immunohistochemical status in breast cancer tissue.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Königshoff Melanie, Wilhelm Jochen, Bohle Rainer M, Pingoud Alfred, Hahn Meinhard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Amplification of the oncogene HER-2/neu influences breast cancer pathogenesis, and therapy and prognosis may be affected by the degree of amplification. The extent of amplification or protein overexpression typically is analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry (IHC), but quantitative PCR techniques have been described that may provide alternatives to these methods.
METHODS: We developed a rapid-cycle, real-time PCR assay for quantification of HER-2/neu gene status. We compared results obtained with this assay with short tandem repeat findings by capillary electrophoresis (CE) and with protein overexpression assessments by IHC. Accuracy and linearity were tested on cell lines and with simulation experiments. We analyzed the amplification of HER-2/neu in 51 clinical tissue samples from patients with suspected breast cancer.
RESULTS: The intra- and interrun CVs for HER-2/neu quantification by real-time PCR were 12% and 18%, and the CV for different simulated amplification and deletion experiments was <7%. The results for HER-2/neu gene status in cell lines matched the values reported in literature. We detected HER-2/neu amplification by real-time PCR in 11 samples, all from patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Allelic imbalances were found by CE analyses in three samples and by protein overexpression in six samples; five of these were also detected by real-time PCR. Comparison of the quantification results with known prognostic indices yielded results similar to those reported in several other published studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The assay is suitable for accurate and precise quantification of HER-2/neu copy numbers in tumor tissue samples obtained in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: We developed a rapid-cycle, real-time PCR assay for quantification of HER-2/neu gene status. We compared results obtained with this assay with short tandem repeat findings by capillary electrophoresis (CE) and with protein overexpression assessments by IHC. Accuracy and linearity were tested on cell lines and with simulation experiments. We analyzed the amplification of HER-2/neu in 51 clinical tissue samples from patients with suspected breast cancer.
RESULTS: The intra- and interrun CVs for HER-2/neu quantification by real-time PCR were 12% and 18%, and the CV for different simulated amplification and deletion experiments was <7%. The results for HER-2/neu gene status in cell lines matched the values reported in literature. We detected HER-2/neu amplification by real-time PCR in 11 samples, all from patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Allelic imbalances were found by CE analyses in three samples and by protein overexpression in six samples; five of these were also detected by real-time PCR. Comparison of the quantification results with known prognostic indices yielded results similar to those reported in several other published studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The assay is suitable for accurate and precise quantification of HER-2/neu copy numbers in tumor tissue samples obtained in routine clinical practice.