MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13546805.2018.1461618

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive neuropsychiatry · 2018

Validation of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test in a healthy Spanish sample and women with anorexia nervosa.

Redondo Iratxe, Herrero-Fernández David

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to build a Spanish version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) including limited time of response and an integrated glossary, and to test its validity.

METHODS

A total of 433 university students (121 men and 350 women) and 38 anorexic women completed the RMET and other related measures of empathy and alexithymia. The results of the Parallel Analysis suggested a unidimensional structure for 19 items, which was verified through a Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

RESULTS

Similarly to other research, this factor had a low reliability (α = .56, ρ = .59); however, regarding validity, the total score of the instrument showed positive correlations with empathy and negatives with alexithymia. Furthermore, healthy females were superior to males in RMET, and to anorexic women; but no significant differences appeared between healthy men and the anorexic group.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the validity of the test and permits a relatively short and inexpensive means of administration in large samples of adults. Besides, it suggests the necessity of assessing and treating the theory of mind in anorexic women.

Для цитирования: Redondo Iratxe, Herrero-Fernández David. Validation of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test in a healthy Spanish sample and women with anorexia nervosa.. Cognitive neuropsychiatry. 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2018.1461618.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.