Neurologia · 2020
A series of patients with refractory myasthenia gravis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garcia-Garcia J, Díaz-Maroto I, Martínez-Martín A, Pardal-Fernández J M, Segura T
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Advances in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have improved quality of life and prognosis for the majority of patients. However, 10%-20% of patients present refractory MG, with frequent relapses and significant functional limitations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory MG were selected from a cohort of patients diagnosed with MG between January 2008 and June 2019. Refractory MG was defined as lack of response to treatment with prednisone and at least 2 immunosuppressants, inability to withdraw treatment without relapse in the last 12 months, or intolerance to treatment with severe adverse reactions.
RESULTS: We identified 84 patients with MG, 11 of whom (13%) met criteria for refractory MG. Mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (18) years; 64% of patients with refractory MG had early-onset generalised myasthenia (as compared to 22% in the group of patients with MG; P<.01), with a higher proportion of women in this group (P<.01). Disease severity at diagnosis and at the time of data analysis was higher among patients with refractory MG, who presented more relapses during follow-up. Logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between refractory MG and the number of severe relapses.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with refractory MG in our series (13%) is similar to those reported in previous studies; these patients were often women and presented early onset, severe forms of onset, and repeated relapses requiring hospital admission during follow-up.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory MG were selected from a cohort of patients diagnosed with MG between January 2008 and June 2019. Refractory MG was defined as lack of response to treatment with prednisone and at least 2 immunosuppressants, inability to withdraw treatment without relapse in the last 12 months, or intolerance to treatment with severe adverse reactions.
RESULTS: We identified 84 patients with MG, 11 of whom (13%) met criteria for refractory MG. Mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (18) years; 64% of patients with refractory MG had early-onset generalised myasthenia (as compared to 22% in the group of patients with MG; P<.01), with a higher proportion of women in this group (P<.01). Disease severity at diagnosis and at the time of data analysis was higher among patients with refractory MG, who presented more relapses during follow-up. Logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between refractory MG and the number of severe relapses.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with refractory MG in our series (13%) is similar to those reported in previous studies; these patients were often women and presented early onset, severe forms of onset, and repeated relapses requiring hospital admission during follow-up.