The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice · 1996
Detecting and treating bulimia nervosa: how involved are family physicians?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bursten M S, Gabel L L, Brose J A, Monk J S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about bulimia nervosa in the primary care setting. Existing medical literature suggests that primary care physicians have limited experience with bulimia nervosa.
METHODS: Experiences of family physicians with bulimia nervosa specifically and eating disorders in general were assessed by a questionnaire mailed to a representative sample (596 subjects) of Ohio family physicians. The response rate was 52.6 percent.
RESULTS: Approximately 30 percent of the respondents had never diagnosed bulimia in a patient; 60 percent had no bulimic patients at the time of the survey. The mean career total of bulimic patients per physician was 5.3 (SD = 5.6). Younger physicians and female physicians were more likely to have bulimic patients. Having bulimic patients correlated significantly with having contact with bulimic and with anorexic persons in nonoffice settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a general prevalence rate of about 1 percent for bulimia (much greater for the female population, particularly in adolescents and athletes), nearly one third of Ohio family physicians have never diagnosed bulimia in a patient, and nearly two thirds are not currently providing care for bulimic patients. Because screening is quick, inexpensive, and straightforward, all at-risk patients--athletes or those who have concerns related to paucity of menstruation, gastrointestinal symptoms, dieting or weight concerns, and depression--should be screened for bulimia.
METHODS: Experiences of family physicians with bulimia nervosa specifically and eating disorders in general were assessed by a questionnaire mailed to a representative sample (596 subjects) of Ohio family physicians. The response rate was 52.6 percent.
RESULTS: Approximately 30 percent of the respondents had never diagnosed bulimia in a patient; 60 percent had no bulimic patients at the time of the survey. The mean career total of bulimic patients per physician was 5.3 (SD = 5.6). Younger physicians and female physicians were more likely to have bulimic patients. Having bulimic patients correlated significantly with having contact with bulimic and with anorexic persons in nonoffice settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a general prevalence rate of about 1 percent for bulimia (much greater for the female population, particularly in adolescents and athletes), nearly one third of Ohio family physicians have never diagnosed bulimia in a patient, and nearly two thirds are not currently providing care for bulimic patients. Because screening is quick, inexpensive, and straightforward, all at-risk patients--athletes or those who have concerns related to paucity of menstruation, gastrointestinal symptoms, dieting or weight concerns, and depression--should be screened for bulimia.