DOI 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100342
The role of near-patient coeliac serology testing in the follow-up of patients with coeliac disease.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This pilot study was undertaken to assess the validity and effectiveness of near-patient coeliac immunological testing, compared to standard laboratory immunological techniques, used in the context of dietician-led coeliac disease follow-up clinics.
DESIGN
The study was designed in two phases, each assessing the near-patient test and standard laboratory immunological techniques. Phase 1 analysed stored serum samples; Phase 2 analysed whole blood from patients attending the dietician-led coeliac disease clinics.
SETTING
Patients were recruited from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton (n=50), and Imperial College London (n=30), between March 2010 and February 2011.
PATIENTS: Those with a diagnosis of coeliac disease for greater than 12 months attending dietician-led coeliac disease clinics.
INTERVENTIONS: In addition to whole blood taken for routine analysis, patients required a capillary finger-prick blood sample.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: To determine if the whole blood and serum near-patient test results were in correlation with outcomes of standard laboratory evaluation.
RESULTS
Phase 1 demonstrated that the near-patient serum test had a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI 0.79% to 0.98%), specificity of 94.9% (0.83% to 0.99%), when compared to standard laboratory ELISA. Phase 2, involving patients whole blood, had a sensitivity of 77.8% (0.45% to 0.93%), and specificity of 100% (0.94% to 1%).
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot study has demonstrated that there appears to be a role for near-patient testing in coeliac disease, but further studies are recommended.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.