MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2012/269689

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in pediatrics · 2012

Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in a child with type I diabetes and unrecognised coeliac disease.

Sharp Jemima, Pizer Barry, Kokai George, Auth Marcus K H

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Screening for coeliac disease is recommended for children from certain risk groups, with implications for diagnostic procedures and dietetic management. The risk of a malignant complication in untreated coeliac disease is not considered high in children. We present the case of a girl with type I diabetes who developed weight loss, fatigue, and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Four years before, when she was asymptomatic, a screening coeliac tTG test was positive, but gluten was not eliminated from her diet. Based on clinical examination, a duodenal biopsy, and an inguinal lymph node biopsy were performed, which confirmed both coeliac disease and an anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. HLA-typing demonstrated that she was homozygous for HLA-DQ8, which is associated with higher risk for celiac disease, more severe gluten sensitivity, and diabetes susceptibility. She responded well to chemotherapy and has been in remission for over 4 years. She remains on a gluten-free diet. This is the first case reporting the association of coeliac disease, type I diabetes, and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in childhood. The case highlights the malignancy risk in a genetically predisposed individual, and the possible role of a perpetuated immunologic response by prolonged gluten exposure.

Для цитирования: Sharp Jemima, Pizer Barry, Kokai George, Auth Marcus K H. Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in a child with type I diabetes and unrecognised coeliac disease.. Case reports in pediatrics. 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/269689.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.