Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with right bundle branch block.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sillanmäki Saara, Aapro Sini, Lipponen Jukka A, Tarvainen Mika P, Laitinen Tiina, Hedman Marja, Hämäläinen Hanna, Laitinen Tomi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Though fairly benign reputation, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) can cause left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD). Still, the relationship between electrical disturbance and LVMD is partly unclear among these patients.
METHODS: Thirty patients with RBBB and 60 matching controls were studied with vector electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging phase analysis. RBBB group was divided into those with and those without LVMD.
RESULTS: Prevalence of LVMD among RBBB patients was 50% and among controls 22%. Odds ratio (OR) for LVMD in patients with RBBB vs controls without RBBB was 3.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 9.3). Ejection fraction (EF), end-systolic volume, the angle between QRS and T vectors, and the QRS angle in the sagittal plane were significantly different between RBBB patients with and without LVMD. The QRS duration was comparable in these groups. EF associated independently with LVMD, explaining 60% of its variation. A cut-off value of EF ≤ 55% detected LVMD in 100% specificity (sensitivity of 47%).
CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with RBBB had LVMD. The OR for LVMD between RBBB and normal ECG was 3.6. It seems that EF, rather than electrical parameters, is the main determinant of LVMD. This information might be useful when evaluating indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
METHODS: Thirty patients with RBBB and 60 matching controls were studied with vector electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging phase analysis. RBBB group was divided into those with and those without LVMD.
RESULTS: Prevalence of LVMD among RBBB patients was 50% and among controls 22%. Odds ratio (OR) for LVMD in patients with RBBB vs controls without RBBB was 3.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 9.3). Ejection fraction (EF), end-systolic volume, the angle between QRS and T vectors, and the QRS angle in the sagittal plane were significantly different between RBBB patients with and without LVMD. The QRS duration was comparable in these groups. EF associated independently with LVMD, explaining 60% of its variation. A cut-off value of EF ≤ 55% detected LVMD in 100% specificity (sensitivity of 47%).
CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with RBBB had LVMD. The OR for LVMD between RBBB and normal ECG was 3.6. It seems that EF, rather than electrical parameters, is the main determinant of LVMD. This information might be useful when evaluating indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.