MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000001295

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2023

OPTIC DISK PIT STUFFING-TO DO OR NOT TO DO.

Anand Abhishek, Sinha Shivani, Kumari Aayushi, Mohan Nilesh, Sinha Bibhuti P

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Optic disk pit (ODP) is a subset of spectrum of congenital cavitary anomalies. Optic disk pit maculopathy causes progressive visual deterioration and is addressed with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without ODP stuffing.

PATIENT AND

METHODS

We report a case of progressive ODP maculopathy who was taken up for 23-G 3-port PPV, with complete vitreous removal and stuffing of the ODP with autologous sclera and sequential analysis of change in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness.

RESULTS

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography RNFL analysis at 1 and 12 months follow-up postoperatively showed total RNFL thickness decrease from 130 µm to 103 µm respectively. Hemiquadrant analysis showed slight reduction of superior RNFL thickness from 142 µm to 139 µm. However, in the inferior hemiquadrant, the reduction in mean RNFL thickness seems to be significant from 133 µm to 100 µm at 1 and 12 months respectively. Sector-wise analysis of the RNFL thickness showed maximum reduction in the inferotemporal quadrant and other sectors seemed to be relatively preserved corresponding to the area of scleral stuffing.

CONCLUSION

Retrospective or prospective analysis of RNFL health of patients undergoing surgery for ODP-M with stuffing needs to evaluated.

Для цитирования: Anand Abhishek, Sinha Shivani, Kumari Aayushi, Mohan Nilesh, Sinha Bibhuti P. OPTIC DISK PIT STUFFING-TO DO OR NOT TO DO.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000001295.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.