American journal of preventive medicine · 1998
Oklahoma Firearm-Related Injury Surveillance.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Archer P J, Mallonee S, Schmidt A C, Ikeda R M
Аннотация
CONTEXT: The magnitude of firearm-related deaths is known, but few studies have evaluated the magnitude and epidemiology of nonfatal firearm-related injuries. The circumstances resulting in fatal versus nonfatal injury are likely very different. No single data source provides complete details on nonfatal shootings.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a surveillance system to define the epidemiology of fatal and nonfatal firearm-related injuries.
DESIGN: Data were collected on fatal and nonfatal firearm-related injuries that occurred in 1995.
SETTING: State of Oklahoma.
PARTICIPANTS: Medical Examiner, Vital Statistics, hospital emergency and medical records departments, police departments, newspaper clipping service.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate of firearm-related injuries; case-fatality rate; demographic, medical, and epidemiologic data; sensitivity of each reporting source; completeness of reporting.
RESULTS: The incidence rate of firearm-related injuries was 45.5 per 100,000 population. The case fatality rate was 35%. Injury rates were highest among adolescents, young adults, males, and African Americans. The Medical Examiner and Vital Statistics reported 87% and 98% of fatal cases, respectively. Passive surveillance of hospital emergency departments identified 72% of patients seeking hospital treatment. Among inpatients, 81% were identified by medical records departments. Newspaper clippings were obtained for 31% of cases. Information on the victim-perpetrator relationship and the type of firearm was available for 79% and 80% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Statewide surveillance of firearm-related injuries using multiple data sources is possible and provides a picture of the overall firearm-related injury problem. Strategies to enhance computer linkages of medical and police data should be pursued to maximize the sensitivity of reporting and minimize the costs of surveillance.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a surveillance system to define the epidemiology of fatal and nonfatal firearm-related injuries.
DESIGN: Data were collected on fatal and nonfatal firearm-related injuries that occurred in 1995.
SETTING: State of Oklahoma.
PARTICIPANTS: Medical Examiner, Vital Statistics, hospital emergency and medical records departments, police departments, newspaper clipping service.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate of firearm-related injuries; case-fatality rate; demographic, medical, and epidemiologic data; sensitivity of each reporting source; completeness of reporting.
RESULTS: The incidence rate of firearm-related injuries was 45.5 per 100,000 population. The case fatality rate was 35%. Injury rates were highest among adolescents, young adults, males, and African Americans. The Medical Examiner and Vital Statistics reported 87% and 98% of fatal cases, respectively. Passive surveillance of hospital emergency departments identified 72% of patients seeking hospital treatment. Among inpatients, 81% were identified by medical records departments. Newspaper clippings were obtained for 31% of cases. Information on the victim-perpetrator relationship and the type of firearm was available for 79% and 80% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Statewide surveillance of firearm-related injuries using multiple data sources is possible and provides a picture of the overall firearm-related injury problem. Strategies to enhance computer linkages of medical and police data should be pursued to maximize the sensitivity of reporting and minimize the costs of surveillance.