Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2002
Influence of liquid films on mercury vapor loss from dental amalgam.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mahler David B, Adey Jerome D, Simms Lisa E, Marek Miroslav
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aqueous liquid films on Hg emission from of dental amalgam.
METHODS: Amalgam specimens (4 mm dia. x 4 mm long) made from ten alloys were uniformly abraded on wet ASTM 600 grit SiC paper, quickly dried and covered by liquid films of a thickness that approximated the thickness of saliva films on tooth surfaces in vivo. Distilled water and two formulations of artificial saliva were tested. After abrasion and film placement, the specimens were immediately inserted in a plastic tube which was then closed. After 30 min, the Hg vapor that had collected in the tube was measured using a Jerome 411Hg analyzer. Hg emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air was also measured and used for comparative purposes. The test results were compared using ANOVA and Tukey's contrast test (p=0.05).
RESULTS: Hg emission from abraded surfaces under liquid films was one to two orders of magnitude less than Hg emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air.
SIGNIFICANCE: In vitro measurement of Hg vapor emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air should not be used to estimate directly the Hg vapor release from dental amalgam restorations in vivo.
METHODS: Amalgam specimens (4 mm dia. x 4 mm long) made from ten alloys were uniformly abraded on wet ASTM 600 grit SiC paper, quickly dried and covered by liquid films of a thickness that approximated the thickness of saliva films on tooth surfaces in vivo. Distilled water and two formulations of artificial saliva were tested. After abrasion and film placement, the specimens were immediately inserted in a plastic tube which was then closed. After 30 min, the Hg vapor that had collected in the tube was measured using a Jerome 411Hg analyzer. Hg emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air was also measured and used for comparative purposes. The test results were compared using ANOVA and Tukey's contrast test (p=0.05).
RESULTS: Hg emission from abraded surfaces under liquid films was one to two orders of magnitude less than Hg emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air.
SIGNIFICANCE: In vitro measurement of Hg vapor emission from abraded surfaces exposed to air should not be used to estimate directly the Hg vapor release from dental amalgam restorations in vivo.