The American journal of the medical sciences · 2014
Dynamic use of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided acute coronary syndrome therapy.
СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dong Sheng-Yong, Dong Mao-Sheng, Chen Zhi-Heng, Sun Jing, Yang Xue, Zeng Qiang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Very few studies have evaluated the potential of using B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as surrogate markers to guide clinical interventional or conservative therapy decisions.
AIM: : The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential of using BNP and NT-proBNP as surrogate markers to guide clinical interventional or conservative therapy decisions.
METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials that randomized patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation ACS to early invasive therapy versus a more conservative approach by systematic search of articles and databases.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 8125 patients and with a mean duration of 11.2 months were included in the meta-analysis. At a mean follow-up of 11.2 months, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 5.9% in the early invasive group, compared with 6.8% in the conservative group (risk ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.86; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, BNP/NT-proBNP-guided management of ACS is significantly improved by early invasive therapy by improving long-term survival and reducing nonfatal myocardial infarction for unstable angina. However, there does not seem to be a clear benefit of using such a strategy over existing clinical recommendations.
AIM: : The aim of the current study was to evaluate the potential of using BNP and NT-proBNP as surrogate markers to guide clinical interventional or conservative therapy decisions.
METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials that randomized patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation ACS to early invasive therapy versus a more conservative approach by systematic search of articles and databases.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 8125 patients and with a mean duration of 11.2 months were included in the meta-analysis. At a mean follow-up of 11.2 months, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 5.9% in the early invasive group, compared with 6.8% in the conservative group (risk ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.86; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, BNP/NT-proBNP-guided management of ACS is significantly improved by early invasive therapy by improving long-term survival and reducing nonfatal myocardial infarction for unstable angina. However, there does not seem to be a clear benefit of using such a strategy over existing clinical recommendations.