American journal of dentistry · 2002
Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murray Peter E, About Imad, Lumley Philip J, Franquin Jean-Claude, Remusat Mireille, Smith Anthony J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate pulpal injury by measuring odontoblast numbers, and pulp dentin repair activity by measuring reactionary dentin area, in relation to the remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of cavity preparations in 217 human teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cavities were restored with adhesive bonded composite, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, zinc oxide-eugenol or calcium hydroxide materials. The teeth were extracted for orthodontic reasons between 20-381 days post-operatively, and odontoblast numbers and reactionary dentin area were analyzed histomorphometrically, and statistically using ANOVA.
RESULTS: Reactionary dentin deposition was observed beneath cavities with a RDT above 0.5 mm as well as beneath cavities with a RDT below 0.25 mm; however maximal reactionary dentin appeared to be beneath cavities with an a RDT between 0.5-0.25 mm (P= 0.0001). The area of reactionary repair was also influenced by the choice of restoration material (P= 0.0385) from greatest to least; calcium hydroxide, composite, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and zinc oxide-eugenol. Odontoblast numbers were maintained beneath cavities with a RDT above 0.25 mm, cavities placed closer to the pulp appeared to injure underlying odontoblasts, reducing their numbers (P= 0.0001). The choice of cavity restoration material also influenced the survival of underlying odontoblasts (P= 0.0061).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cavities were restored with adhesive bonded composite, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, zinc oxide-eugenol or calcium hydroxide materials. The teeth were extracted for orthodontic reasons between 20-381 days post-operatively, and odontoblast numbers and reactionary dentin area were analyzed histomorphometrically, and statistically using ANOVA.
RESULTS: Reactionary dentin deposition was observed beneath cavities with a RDT above 0.5 mm as well as beneath cavities with a RDT below 0.25 mm; however maximal reactionary dentin appeared to be beneath cavities with an a RDT between 0.5-0.25 mm (P= 0.0001). The area of reactionary repair was also influenced by the choice of restoration material (P= 0.0385) from greatest to least; calcium hydroxide, composite, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and zinc oxide-eugenol. Odontoblast numbers were maintained beneath cavities with a RDT above 0.25 mm, cavities placed closer to the pulp appeared to injure underlying odontoblasts, reducing their numbers (P= 0.0001). The choice of cavity restoration material also influenced the survival of underlying odontoblasts (P= 0.0061).