Oral health status of an indigenous adult population of Central America.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the caries experience and periodontal disease status in adults of an indigenous rural community of Guatemala, and assess the suitability for longitudinal investigations.
BASIC RESEARCH
DESIGN
This investigation comprised an initial screen (Study I) and a more detailed periodontal examination (Study II). In Study I, caries and gingivitis levels were determined. In Study II, pocket probing depths (PPDs) and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were recorded on all teeth excluding third molars.
CLINICAL
SETTING
Tzununa, Guatemala, Central America.
PARTICIPANTS
Studies I and II were conducted in 120 adults 3 18 years and 54 adults 3 25 years respectively.
RESULTS
In both Studies I and II, tooth retention was high with a mean tooth count of 28.2 and 27.2 respectively. Extensive soft deposits and both supra- and subgingival calculus were almost universal, although gingivitis was less than expected (Study I: Mean percentage of sites bleeding on probing = 27.6). In Study I, the mean number of carious teeth was 8.6 and there was no statistically significant correlation with age. In Study II, PPD 3 5mm and CAL 3 6mm were highly prevalent (100% and 56% of subjects respectively), although widespread and severe disease was not evident.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the high caries level and the evidence of periodontal destruction in the majority of subjects, all study subjects had a functional dentition suggesting that emergency treatment remains the current priority. Longitudinal studies in such untreated populations would provide increased understanding of the role of environmental factors in disease etiology. The study also highlighted some methodological issues pertinent to conducting studies in remote communities.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.