MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.09.003

Медицинская библиотека · Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2006

Writer's cramp: restoration of striatal D2-binding after successful biofeedback-based sensorimotor training.

Berger Hans J, van der Werf Sieberen P, Horstink Casper A, Cools Alexander R, Oyen Wim J, Horstink Martin W

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies of writer's cramp have detected cerebral sensorimotor abnormalities in this disorder and, more specifically, a reduced striatal D2-binding as assessed by [(123)I]IBZM SPECT. However, empirical data were lacking about the influence of effective biofeedback-based sensorimotor training on D2 receptor binding.

METHODS

To determine whether there is a restoration of D2-binding after successful sensorimotor treatment, pre- and posttreatment SPECTs were compared in five patients with writer's cramp and correlated with improvement in handwriting.

RESULTS

After treatment, the clinical and electromyographic picture appeared substantially improved connected with a significant increase in D2-binding to nearly normal levels similar to normative data in age/sex-matched healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

The current study supported the view that writer's cramp results from a plastic adaptation of a rectifiable nigrostriatal dopaminergic system and that effective sensorimotor training leads to increased efficacy of striatal dopaminergic transmission.

Для цитирования: Berger Hans J, van der Werf Sieberen P, Horstink Casper A, Cools Alexander R, Oyen Wim J, Horstink Martin W. Writer's cramp: restoration of striatal D2-binding after successful biofeedback-based sensorimotor training.. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.09.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.