The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020
Long-Term Results of Mitral Repair With Complete Semi-Rigid Rings vs Posterior Flexible Bands.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baccelli Andrea, Lapenna Elisabetta, Del Forno Benedetto, Schiavi Davide, Meneghin Roberta, Giambuzzi Ilaria, Ruggeri Stefania, Castiglioni Alessandro, Alfieri Ottavio, De Bonis Michele
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the type of ring used had an impact on the long-term results of mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), due to posterior leaflet prolapse, treated with quadrangular or triangular resection.
METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2008, 1406 patients with severe MR due to posterior leaflet prolapse underwent mitral repair. Of these patients, we selected 452 consecutive patients treated with the same repair approach. Mitral annuloplasty to complete the repair was performed with a posterior flexible band (n = 260) or a complete semi-rigid ring (n = 192). The 2 groups were comparable at baseline, and their clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared at long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall survival at 14 years was similar (P = .29). The cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with noncardiac death as competing risk, showed no difference (P = .71). At 14 years, probability of recurrence of MR greater than or equal to 3+ was 1.11% in the flexible band group and 3.25% in the semi-rigid ring group (P = .073). At 14 years, probability of recurrence of MR greater than or equal to 2 was 13.49% in the band group vs 10.78% in the semi-rigid ring group (P = .897).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring mitral valve repair for posterior leaflet prolapse, treated with the same repair approach, the type of annuloplasty ring has no impact on the incidence of cardiac death and recurrence of MR at 14 years. Whether these findings remain stable at longer follow-up should be further investigated.
METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2008, 1406 patients with severe MR due to posterior leaflet prolapse underwent mitral repair. Of these patients, we selected 452 consecutive patients treated with the same repair approach. Mitral annuloplasty to complete the repair was performed with a posterior flexible band (n = 260) or a complete semi-rigid ring (n = 192). The 2 groups were comparable at baseline, and their clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared at long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall survival at 14 years was similar (P = .29). The cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with noncardiac death as competing risk, showed no difference (P = .71). At 14 years, probability of recurrence of MR greater than or equal to 3+ was 1.11% in the flexible band group and 3.25% in the semi-rigid ring group (P = .073). At 14 years, probability of recurrence of MR greater than or equal to 2 was 13.49% in the band group vs 10.78% in the semi-rigid ring group (P = .897).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring mitral valve repair for posterior leaflet prolapse, treated with the same repair approach, the type of annuloplasty ring has no impact on the incidence of cardiac death and recurrence of MR at 14 years. Whether these findings remain stable at longer follow-up should be further investigated.