Advances in therapy · 2024
Efficacy and Safety of Transitioning to Lemborexant from Z-drug, Suvorexant, and Ramelteon in Japanese Insomnia Patients: An Open-label, Multicenter Study.
Клиническое исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ozone Motohiro, Hirota Susumu, Ariyoshi Yu, Hayashida Kenichi, Ikegami Azusa, Habukawa Mitsunari, Ohshima Hayato, Harada Daisuke, Hiejima Hiroshi, Kotorii Nozomu, Murotani Kenta, Taninaga Takehiro, Uchimura Naohisa
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: For patients with chronic insomnia, conventional therapy may not always provide satisfactory efficacy and safety. Thus, switching to an alternative therapeutic agent can be explored. However, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of such changes. This prospective, non-randomized, open-label, interventional, multicenter study assessed whether Japanese patients with chronic insomnia dissatisfied with treatment could transition directly to lemborexant (LEM) from four cohorts-non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone) monotherapy, dual orexin receptor antagonist (suvorexant) monotherapy, suvorexant + benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs), and melatonin receptor agonist (ramelteon) combination. We evaluated whether transitioning to LEM improved patient satisfaction based on efficacy and safety.
METHODS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of successful transitions to LEM at 2 weeks (titration phase end), defined as the proportion of patients on LEM by the end of the 2-week titration phase who were willing to continue on LEM during the maintenance phase (Weeks 2-14). Patient satisfaction and safety (the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) were assessed at 14 weeks (end of titration and maintenance phases).
RESULTS: Among the 90 patients enrolled, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 89.0-98.8%) successfully transitioned to LEM at 2 weeks. The proportions of patients who successfully continued on LEM were 97.8% and 82.2% at the end of the titration and maintenance phases (Weeks 2 and 14), respectively. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 47.8%; no serious TEAEs occurred. In all cohorts, the proportions of patients with positive responses were higher than the proportions with negative responses on the three scales of the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia version. During the maintenance phase, Insomnia Severity Index scores generally improved at Weeks 2, 6, and 14 of LEM transition.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct transition to LEM may be a valid treatment option for patients with insomnia who are dissatisfied with current treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04742699.
METHODS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of successful transitions to LEM at 2 weeks (titration phase end), defined as the proportion of patients on LEM by the end of the 2-week titration phase who were willing to continue on LEM during the maintenance phase (Weeks 2-14). Patient satisfaction and safety (the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) were assessed at 14 weeks (end of titration and maintenance phases).
RESULTS: Among the 90 patients enrolled, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 89.0-98.8%) successfully transitioned to LEM at 2 weeks. The proportions of patients who successfully continued on LEM were 97.8% and 82.2% at the end of the titration and maintenance phases (Weeks 2 and 14), respectively. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 47.8%; no serious TEAEs occurred. In all cohorts, the proportions of patients with positive responses were higher than the proportions with negative responses on the three scales of the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia version. During the maintenance phase, Insomnia Severity Index scores generally improved at Weeks 2, 6, and 14 of LEM transition.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct transition to LEM may be a valid treatment option for patients with insomnia who are dissatisfied with current treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04742699.