MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.07.010

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography · 2019

Standardized reporting systems for computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: A real-world validation of CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS in patients with stable chest pain.

Williams Michelle C, Moss Alastair, Dweck Marc, Hunter Amanda, Pawade Tania, Adamson Philip D, Shah Anoop S V, Alam Shirjel, Maroules Christopher D, van Beek Edwin Jr, Cury Ricardo, Nicol Edward D, Newby David E, Roditi Giles

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic implications of standardized reporting systems for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) in patients with stable chest pain.

BACKGROUND

The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting And Data System (CAD-RADS) and Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) aim to improve communication of CACS and CCTA results, but its influence on prognostication is unknown.

METHODS

Images from 1769 patients who underwent CCTA as part of the Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) multi-center randomized controlled trial were assessed. CACS were classified as CAC-DRS 0 to 3 based on Agatston scores. CCTA were classified as CAD-RADS 0 to 5 based on the most clinically relevant finding per patient. The primary outcome was the five-year events of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 58 ± 10 years and 56% were male. CAC-DRS 0, 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 642 (36%), 510 (29%), 239 (14%) and 379 (21%) patients respectively. CAD-RADS 0, 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 5 occurred in 622 (35%), 327 (18%), 211 (12%), 165 (9%), 221 (12%), 42 (2%) and 181 (10%) patients respectively. Patients classified as CAC-DRS 3 were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared to CAC-DRS 0 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 9.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24, 27.31; p < 0.001). Patients with higher CAD-RADS categories were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, with patients classified as CAD-RADS 4B at the highest risk compared to CAD-RADS 0 patients (HR 19.14; 95% CI 4.28, 85.53; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher CAC-DRS and CAD-RADS scores were at increased risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This confirms that the classification provides additional prognostic discrimination for future coronary heart disease events.

Для цитирования: Williams Michelle C, Moss Alastair, Dweck Marc, Hunter Amanda, Pawade Tania, Adamson Philip D, Shah Anoop S V, Alam Shirjel, Maroules Christopher D, van Beek Edwin Jr, Cury Ricardo, Nicol Edward D, Newby David E, Roditi Giles. Standardized reporting systems for computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: A real-world validation of CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS in patients with stable chest pain.. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.07.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.