MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.06.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical lipidology · 2019

Impact of lipoprotein apheresis on thrombotic parameters in patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a): Findings from a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Khan Tina Z, Gorog Diana A, Arachchillage Deepa J, Ahnström Josefin, Rhodes Samantha, Donovan Jacqueline, Banya Winston, Pottle Alison, Barbir Mahmoud, Pennell Dudley J

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Raised lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular risk factor common in patients with refractory angina. The apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a) exhibits structural homology with plasminogen and can enhance thrombosis and impair fibrinolysis.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of lipoprotein apheresis on markers of thrombosis and fibrinolysis in patients with high Lp(a).

METHODS

In a prospective, single-blind, crossover trial, 20 patients with refractory angina and raised Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL were randomized to three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis or sham. Blood taken before and after apheresis/sham was assessed using the Global Thrombosis Test, to assess time taken for in vitro thrombus formation (occlusion time) and endogenous fibrinolysis (lysis time), as well as von Willebrand Factor, fibrinogen, D-dimer, thrombin/anti-thrombin III complex, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, and thrombin generation assays.

RESULTS

Lp(a) was significantly reduced by apheresis (100.2 [interquartile range {IQR}, 69.6143.0] vs 24.8 [17.2,34.0] mg/dL, P = .0001) but not by sham (P = .0001 between treatment arms). Apheresis prolonged occlusion time (576 ± 116 s vs 723 ± 142 s, P < .0001) reflecting reduced platelet reactivity and reduced lysis time (1340 [1128, 1682] s vs 847 [685,1302] s, P = .0006) reflecting enhanced fibrinolysis, without corresponding changes with sham. Apheresis, but not sham, reduced von Willebrand Factor (149 [89.0, 164] vs 64.2 [48.5, 89.8] IU/dL, P = .0001), and fibrinogen (3.12 ± 0.68 vs 2.20 ± 0.53 g/L, P < .0001), and increased prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (158.16 [128.77, 232.09] vs 795.12 [272.55, 1201.00] pmol/L, P = .0006). There was no change in D-dimer, thrombin/anti-thrombin III complex, or thrombin generation assay with apheresis or sham.

CONCLUSION

Lipoprotein apheresis reduces Lp(a) and improves some thrombotic and fibrinolytic parameters in patients with refractory angina.

Для цитирования: Khan Tina Z, Gorog Diana A, Arachchillage Deepa J, Ahnström Josefin, Rhodes Samantha, Donovan Jacqueline, Banya Winston, Pottle Alison, Barbir Mahmoud, Pennell Dudley J. Impact of lipoprotein apheresis on thrombotic parameters in patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a): Findings from a randomized controlled cross-over trial.. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.06.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.