Journal of nursing management · 2026
Development and Validation of a Discharge Readiness Scale for First Allo-HSCT Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Jiao, Feng Yuanyuan, Yuan Jiulian, Zhao Yanmin, Chen Yan, Chen Mengxiao, Zhang Bei, Zhu Ying
Аннотация
AIMS: To develop and validate a disease-specific discharge readiness scale for patients undergoing the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allo-HSCT face unique postdischarge challenges, but no disease-specific assessment tool exists to guide nursing management.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 163 patients. Scale development included literature review, expert consultation, and psychometric testing (item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing).
RESULTS: The final 24-item scale comprised four dimensions: Physiological Stability; Psychological Competence; Information Knowledge and Coping Ability; and Social Support. The scale demonstrated excellent psychometric properties, with a scale-level content validity index of 0.92, explaining 83.488% of the total variance, a Cronbach's α of 0.858, and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.965.
CONCLUSIONS: The scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing discharge readiness in this patient group.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This scale enables nursing managers to identify patients at risk, allocate resources effectively, and deliver targeted discharge interventions to improve postdischarge outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allo-HSCT face unique postdischarge challenges, but no disease-specific assessment tool exists to guide nursing management.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 163 patients. Scale development included literature review, expert consultation, and psychometric testing (item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing).
RESULTS: The final 24-item scale comprised four dimensions: Physiological Stability; Psychological Competence; Information Knowledge and Coping Ability; and Social Support. The scale demonstrated excellent psychometric properties, with a scale-level content validity index of 0.92, explaining 83.488% of the total variance, a Cronbach's α of 0.858, and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.965.
CONCLUSIONS: The scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing discharge readiness in this patient group.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This scale enables nursing managers to identify patients at risk, allocate resources effectively, and deliver targeted discharge interventions to improve postdischarge outcomes.