Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

The choice of single- versus multiple-visit root canal treatment for infected teeth is in dispute. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit root canal treatment for teeth with infected root canals.

METHODS

An exhaustive literature search combined with specified inclusion criteria was performed to identify randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or quasi-RCTs), comparing root canal treatment in single and multiple appointments (2 or more visits) in patients with infected root canals.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were identified and included in this review. Of these, 6 compared the healing rate and 5 compared the prevalence of post-obturation pain in single- and multiple-visit root canal treatment on teeth with infected root canals. No significant difference was observed in the healing rate between single- versus multiple-visit root canal treatment, as well as the incidence of medium-term post-obturation pain. As to the short-term follow up, the prevalence of post-obturation pain was significantly lower in single-visit than in multiple-visit group.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of current studies, the healing rate of single- and multiple-visit root canal treatment is similar for infected teeth. Patients experience less frequency of short-term post-obturation pain after single-visit than those having multiple-visit root canal treatment.