Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2010
Efficacy of combining a buccal infiltration with an inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parirokh Masoud, Satvati Seyed Amir, Sharifi Rohollah, Rekabi Ali Reza, Gorjestani Hedayat, Nakhaee Nozar, Abbott Paul V
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block combined with buccal infiltration for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.
METHODOLOGY: Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups of 28 patients each. Lidocaine 2% with 1:80,000 epinephrine was used for all injections. Group I patients received an IAN block with 1.8 mL of anesthetic. Group II patients received an IAN block using 3.6 mL. Group III patients received 1.8 mL as an IAN block and 1.8 mL as a buccal infiltration. A visual analogue scale was used to rate pain before anesthesia and discomfort experienced before and during access cavity preparation. Data were analyzed by chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests.
RESULTS: The success rates for groups I to III were 14.8%, 39.3%, and 65.4%, respectively. Group III had significantly better anesthesia compared with group I (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Combining an IAN block and a buccal infiltration injection provided more effective anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis. However, some cases may still require further anesthesia to prevent pain during endodontic treatment.
METHODOLOGY: Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups of 28 patients each. Lidocaine 2% with 1:80,000 epinephrine was used for all injections. Group I patients received an IAN block with 1.8 mL of anesthetic. Group II patients received an IAN block using 3.6 mL. Group III patients received 1.8 mL as an IAN block and 1.8 mL as a buccal infiltration. A visual analogue scale was used to rate pain before anesthesia and discomfort experienced before and during access cavity preparation. Data were analyzed by chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests.
RESULTS: The success rates for groups I to III were 14.8%, 39.3%, and 65.4%, respectively. Group III had significantly better anesthesia compared with group I (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Combining an IAN block and a buccal infiltration injection provided more effective anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis. However, some cases may still require further anesthesia to prevent pain during endodontic treatment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, BuccalAdultAnalysis of VarianceAnesthesia, DentalAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEpinephrineFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMandibleMandibular NerveMolarNerve BlockPain MeasurementProspective StudiesPulpitisRoot Canal TherapyStatistics, NonparametricTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsYoung Adult