Perspectives in psychiatric care · 2008
Comparability between telephone and face-to-face structured clinical interview for DSM-IV in assessing social anxiety disorder.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Crippa José Alexandre S, de Lima Osório Flávia, Del-Ben Cristina Marta, Filho Alaor Santos, da Silva Freitas Maria Cecília, Loureiro Sonia Regina
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This article evaluates the comparability of the telephone and in-person Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) interviews in assessing patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) as an independent anxiety diagnosis.
DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred subjects were randomly selected and interviewed with the SCID, once by telephone and once in person (1-3 months later).
FINDINGS: The prevalence of SAD assessed with the telephone interviews was 56%, whereas the in-person prevalence was 52%, with no statistically significant difference. The test-retest kappa for the 200 interviews was .84, indication of excellent agreement.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings, along with the existing evidence of their validity, should encourage the use of SCID by telephone for SAD diagnostic interviews.
DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred subjects were randomly selected and interviewed with the SCID, once by telephone and once in person (1-3 months later).
FINDINGS: The prevalence of SAD assessed with the telephone interviews was 56%, whereas the in-person prevalence was 52%, with no statistically significant difference. The test-retest kappa for the 200 interviews was .84, indication of excellent agreement.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings, along with the existing evidence of their validity, should encourage the use of SCID by telephone for SAD diagnostic interviews.