MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000001484

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2024

PARADOXICAL EXACERBATION OF SCLEROUVEITIS AFTER RITUXIMAB INFUSION.

Vergouwen Daphne P C, Hermans Maud A W, Sels Lise

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report on an unexpected side effect of rituximab, a B-cell-targeting monoclonal agent, in a patient with severe sclerouveitis, leading to severe visual loss.

METHODS

Observational case report.

RESULTS

A 61-year-old female patient was treated with rituximab for a severe sclerouveitis occurring with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Initially, sclerouveitis responded partly to a high dose of oral corticosteroids. However, her sclerouveitis recurred after 2 months during tapering below 20 mg daily. The days following the rituximab infusions, aggravation of the intraocular inflammation was seen, endangering visual acuity. No evidence for an infection or other cause was found. High doses of oral corticosteroids were started within one week, whereafter the ocular inflammation resolved. For persisting hypotony and chorioretinal detachment, a combined pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification and silicone oil tamponade was performed. The retina remained attached under oil tamponade with partial improvement of the best-corrected visual acuity to finger counting.

CONCLUSION

Ophthalmologist should be aware of the possibility of this paradoxical local reaction to rituximab infusion, particularly in bilateral and/or severe cases, which carry a risk of a poor outcome.

Для цитирования: Vergouwen Daphne P C, Hermans Maud A W, Sels Lise. PARADOXICAL EXACERBATION OF SCLEROUVEITIS AFTER RITUXIMAB INFUSION.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000001484.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.