MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i29.10779

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2022

Secondary light chain amyloidosis with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and intermodal marginal zone lymphoma: A case report.

Zhao Zhen-Yu, Tang Nan, Fu Xiang-Jun, Lin Li-Er

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The co-existence of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) with internodal marginal zone lymphoma (INMZL) is rare and often associated with poor prognosis.

CASE SUMMARY: We present a Chinese female patient who developed secondary light chain amyloidosis due to WM and INMZL and provides opinions on its systemic treatment. A 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with WM 6 years ago and received Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy for two years. Her INMZL was confirmed due to left cervical lymphadenopathy. The patient presented with oedema in both lower limbs one year ago, and was diagnosed with secondary light chain amyloidosis. Treatment with the BC regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m2 monthly for 6-8 courses, and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 per day × 2, monthly for six courses) was initiated, but not tolerated due to toxic side effects. Bortezomib-based therapy was given for two months, including bortezomib, dexamethasone, and zanubrutinb. Oedema in both lower limbs was relieved and treatment efficacy was evaluated as partial remission.

CONCLUSION

A detailed clinical evaluation and active identification of the aetiology are recommended to avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis.

Для цитирования: Zhao Zhen-Yu, Tang Nan, Fu Xiang-Jun, Lin Li-Er. Secondary light chain amyloidosis with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and intermodal marginal zone lymphoma: A case report.. World journal of clinical cases. 2022. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i29.10779.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.