Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2022
In their shoes: Health care professionals walking a day in the life of patients with short bowel syndrome & intestinal failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Twist Katherine, Kelly Sarah, Lal Simon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Short bowel syndrome leading to intestinal failure (SBS-IF) is a condition characterised by the inability of the gut to absorb the amount of water, nutrients and micronutrients needed to survive and requires long term home parenteral nutrition (HPN) to sustain life. Health care professionals (HCPs) working with patients with SBS-IF are aware of the daily challenges patients face. However, few have experienced the condition first-hand and put themselves 'in the shoes' of their patients. In Their Shoes (ITS) is an immersive simulation delivered through a smartphone application (app), in which participants experience the typical real-life challenges that somebody with SBS-IF will experience over a 24-h period, including social and psychological challenges. This study evaluated the impact of ITS simulation on HCPs working with adults with SBS-IF.
METHODS: A representative sample of 27 multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members working on an Intestinal Failure Unit completed the ITS simulation over a 24-h period. A mixed methods design was used, which included participants completing a survey pre- and post-ITS experience, followed by focus groups and in-depth qualitative interviews. Pre- and post-intervention questions were analysed quantitively via paired t-tests and qualitative data arising from the focus groups and interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: 25 participants (93%) completed 80% of the ITS challenges whilst 27 (100%) completed more than 50% challenges. Participants reported a 16% increase in knowledge, 18% increase in being able to talk to others about SBS and a 2% increase in empathy between pre- and post-simulation. Nineteen team members participated in focus groups and 10 in-depth interviews; qualitative analysis of digital recordings comprised four overarching themes: empathy; admiration and respect; empathy fatigue; learning experience. Despite the small and insignificant increase in empathy scores quantitatively, analysis of open-ended questions and qualitative data found that 74% of participants reported an increase in empathy levels whereas 26% felt it stayed the same.
CONCLUSIONS: As a simulation-based learning method, ITS can have a positive impact on HCPs working into the SBS-IF setting. Positive benefits in clinical practice include increased levels of empathy, admiration and respect for patients amongst HCPs. Immersing into the ITS experience also allows HCPs to recognise the function and benefits to MDT working, both in terms of ensuring holistic patient centred care and managing HCP empathy fatigue.
METHODS: A representative sample of 27 multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members working on an Intestinal Failure Unit completed the ITS simulation over a 24-h period. A mixed methods design was used, which included participants completing a survey pre- and post-ITS experience, followed by focus groups and in-depth qualitative interviews. Pre- and post-intervention questions were analysed quantitively via paired t-tests and qualitative data arising from the focus groups and interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: 25 participants (93%) completed 80% of the ITS challenges whilst 27 (100%) completed more than 50% challenges. Participants reported a 16% increase in knowledge, 18% increase in being able to talk to others about SBS and a 2% increase in empathy between pre- and post-simulation. Nineteen team members participated in focus groups and 10 in-depth interviews; qualitative analysis of digital recordings comprised four overarching themes: empathy; admiration and respect; empathy fatigue; learning experience. Despite the small and insignificant increase in empathy scores quantitatively, analysis of open-ended questions and qualitative data found that 74% of participants reported an increase in empathy levels whereas 26% felt it stayed the same.
CONCLUSIONS: As a simulation-based learning method, ITS can have a positive impact on HCPs working into the SBS-IF setting. Positive benefits in clinical practice include increased levels of empathy, admiration and respect for patients amongst HCPs. Immersing into the ITS experience also allows HCPs to recognise the function and benefits to MDT working, both in terms of ensuring holistic patient centred care and managing HCP empathy fatigue.