MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0280908

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2023

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling in frontline healthcare workers: An observational cohort study.

Walker Naomi F, Byrne Rachel L, Howard Ashleigh, Nikolaou Elissavet, Farrar Madlen, Glynn Sharon, Cheliotis Katerina S, Cubas Atienzar Ana I, Davies Kelly, Reiné Jesús, Rashid-Gardner Zalina, German Esther L, Solórzano Carla, Blandamer Tess, Hitchins Lisa, Myerscough Christopher, Gessner Bradford D, Begier Elizabeth, Collins Andrea M, Beadsworth Mike, Todd Stacy, Hill Helen, Houlihan Catherine F, Nastouli Eleni, Adams Emily R, Mitsi Elena, Ferreira Daniela M, SAFER investigators

Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems worldwide, including the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). We conducted an observational cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in frontline healthcare workers (HCW) working in an acute NHS Trust during the first wave of the pandemic, to answer emerging questions surrounding SARS-CoV-2 infection, diagnosis, transmission and control.

METHODS

Using self-collected weekly saliva and twice weekly combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal (OP/NP) samples, in addition to self-assessed symptom profiles and isolation behaviours, we retrospectively compared SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR of saliva and OP/NP samples. We report the association with contemporaneous symptoms and isolation behaviour.

RESULTS

Over a 12-week period from 30th March 2020, 40·0% (n = 34/85, 95% confidence interval 31·3-51·8%) HCW had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by surveillance OP/NP swab and/or saliva sample. Symptoms were reported by 47·1% (n = 40) and self-isolation by 25·9% (n = 22) participants. Only 44.1% (n = 15/34) participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection reported any symptoms within 14 days of a positive result and only 29·4% (n = 10/34) reported self-isolation periods. Overall agreement between paired saliva and OP/NP swabs was 93·4% (n = 211/226 pairs) but rates of positive concordance were low. In paired samples with at least one positive result, 35·0% (n = 7/20) were positive exclusively by OP/NP swab, 40·0% (n = 8/20) exclusively by saliva and in only 25·0% (n = 5/20) were the OP/NP and saliva result both positive.

CONCLUSIONS

HCW are a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in hospitals and symptom screening will identify the minority of infections. Without routine asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 screening, it is likely that HCW with SARS-CoV-2 infection would continue to attend work. Saliva, in addition to OP/NP swab testing, facilitated ascertainment of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Combined saliva and OP/NP swab sampling would improve detection of SARS-CoV-2 for surveillance and is recommended for a high sensitivity strategy.

Для цитирования: Walker Naomi F, Byrne Rachel L, Howard Ashleigh, Nikolaou Elissavet, Farrar Madlen, Glynn Sharon, Cheliotis Katerina S, Cubas Atienzar Ana I, Davies Kelly, Reiné Jesús, Rashid-Gardner Zalina, German Esther L, Solórzano Carla, Blandamer Tess, Hitchins Lisa, Myerscough Christopher, Gessner Bradford D, Begier Elizabeth, Collins Andrea M, Beadsworth Mike, Todd Stacy, Hill Helen, Houlihan Catherine F, Nastouli Eleni, Adams Emily R, Mitsi Elena, Ferreira Daniela M, SAFER investigators. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling in frontline healthcare workers: An observational cohort study.. PloS one. 2023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280908.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.