MedElevator
Войти в исследования Obesity surgery · 2025
Comparison of Mid- and Long-term Outcomes of Antrum-Resecting Versus Antrum-Preserving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Demirpolat Muhammed Taha, Islam Mehmet Muzaffer, Bacaksız Mehmet Erman, Şişik Abdullah, Kermansaravi Mohammad
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the mid- and long-term results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) according to the distance of the first staple from the pylorus.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent LSG. While the distance of the first staple from the pylorus was 2-3 cm in group A, the distance of the first staple to the pylorus was 5-6 cm in group B. Laboratory parameters, comorbidity resolution, anthropometric measurements, and complications were documented at the end of the first, third, and fifth postoperative years.
RESULTS: Of the total 376 patients, 127 were excluded for various reasons, 102 patients were lost to follow-up, and 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Upon examining the follow-up data at the 1st, 3rd, and 5th years, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of total weight loss (TWL%), excess body mass index loss (EBMIL%), and recurrent weight gain (RWG)%, with group A showing an advantage. The majority of the patients requiring conversional metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) were in group B, and the difference was significant (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: The distance of the first staple from the pylorus may significantly influence the outcomes related to RWG%, TWL%, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) resolution in the medium-long-term. Furthermore, additional research is needed to determine the optimal positioning for enhanced patient results.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent LSG. While the distance of the first staple from the pylorus was 2-3 cm in group A, the distance of the first staple to the pylorus was 5-6 cm in group B. Laboratory parameters, comorbidity resolution, anthropometric measurements, and complications were documented at the end of the first, third, and fifth postoperative years.
RESULTS: Of the total 376 patients, 127 were excluded for various reasons, 102 patients were lost to follow-up, and 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Upon examining the follow-up data at the 1st, 3rd, and 5th years, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of total weight loss (TWL%), excess body mass index loss (EBMIL%), and recurrent weight gain (RWG)%, with group A showing an advantage. The majority of the patients requiring conversional metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) were in group B, and the difference was significant (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: The distance of the first staple from the pylorus may significantly influence the outcomes related to RWG%, TWL%, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) resolution in the medium-long-term. Furthermore, additional research is needed to determine the optimal positioning for enhanced patient results.