La Radiologia medica · 2015
Effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for laryngeal preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Xiao-Ning, Chen Liang-Si, Zhang Si-Yi, Lu Zhong-Ming, Huang Yan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of laryngectomy and three larynx-preservation treatments in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched (until May 5, 2014) for studies that evaluated total laryngectomy followed by radiation and three larynx-preserving strategies in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. The outcomes assessed were the 2- to 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) RESULTS: The search identified ten studies which were used for the meta-analysis (N = 2013 patients). The meta-analysis found that among different treatments, RT alone was associated with the highest rate of OS (71.6 %), DFS (57.8 %), and LFS (79.0 %). OS was similar among the following treatments: laryngectomy→RT vs. CT→RT [P = 0.402]; RT+CT vs. RT alone [P = 0.440]; and RT+CT vs CT→RT [P = 0.588]. DFS rate was higher in patients receiving laryngectomy→RT than CT→RT (P = 0.001) and was similar for RT+CT compared with CT→RT (P = 0.590).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that of the larynx-preserving treatments, RT alone was associated with highest rates of OS, DFS, and LFS in patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx and hypopharynx. Laryngectomy provided a better rate of DFS than CT and RT, but OS were similar across the different larynx-preserving treatments and laryngectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases were searched (until May 5, 2014) for studies that evaluated total laryngectomy followed by radiation and three larynx-preserving strategies in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. The outcomes assessed were the 2- to 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) RESULTS: The search identified ten studies which were used for the meta-analysis (N = 2013 patients). The meta-analysis found that among different treatments, RT alone was associated with the highest rate of OS (71.6 %), DFS (57.8 %), and LFS (79.0 %). OS was similar among the following treatments: laryngectomy→RT vs. CT→RT [P = 0.402]; RT+CT vs. RT alone [P = 0.440]; and RT+CT vs CT→RT [P = 0.588]. DFS rate was higher in patients receiving laryngectomy→RT than CT→RT (P = 0.001) and was similar for RT+CT compared with CT→RT (P = 0.590).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that of the larynx-preserving treatments, RT alone was associated with highest rates of OS, DFS, and LFS in patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx and hypopharynx. Laryngectomy provided a better rate of DFS than CT and RT, but OS were similar across the different larynx-preserving treatments and laryngectomy.