Head & neck · 2014
Outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for hypopharyngeal cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mok Gary, Gauthier Isabelle, Jiang Haiyan, Huang Shao Hui, Chan Kelvin, Witterick Ian J, O'Sullivan Brian, Waldron John N, Bayley Andrew J, Cho B C John, Cummings Bernard J, Dawson Laura A, Hope Andrew J, Kim John J, Ringash Jolie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to discuss if the adoption of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has improved the outcome.
METHODS: We compared 3-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy (RT) and IMRT in all patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with curative intent RT or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from January 1, 2000, to February 28, 2010. Locoregional control, overall survival (OS), distant relapse rate, larynx preservation rate, and enteral feeding tube duration were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 181 consecutive patients, 90 received 3D-RT and 91 received IMRT. At 3 years, the IMRT group had higher locoregional control compared with the 3D-RT group (75% vs 58%; p = .003), but similar OS (50% vs 52%; p = .99), distant relapse rate (23% vs 20%; p = .79), and larynx-preservation rate (90% vs 86%; p = .16). The 2-year enteral feeding tube dependency rate was similar in both groups (19% vs 18%; p = .12).
CONCLUSION: Patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with IMRT showed a higher locoregional control compared with 3D-RT. However, distant-relapse rate and OS remain comparable between treatment techniques.
METHODS: We compared 3-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy (RT) and IMRT in all patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with curative intent RT or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from January 1, 2000, to February 28, 2010. Locoregional control, overall survival (OS), distant relapse rate, larynx preservation rate, and enteral feeding tube duration were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 181 consecutive patients, 90 received 3D-RT and 91 received IMRT. At 3 years, the IMRT group had higher locoregional control compared with the 3D-RT group (75% vs 58%; p = .003), but similar OS (50% vs 52%; p = .99), distant relapse rate (23% vs 20%; p = .79), and larynx-preservation rate (90% vs 86%; p = .16). The 2-year enteral feeding tube dependency rate was similar in both groups (19% vs 18%; p = .12).
CONCLUSION: Patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with IMRT showed a higher locoregional control compared with 3D-RT. However, distant-relapse rate and OS remain comparable between treatment techniques.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansHypopharyngeal NeoplasmsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOntarioProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment Outcome