Insecticide Resistance and Target-Site Mutations kdr, N1575Y, and Ace-1 in Anopheles gambiae s.l. Populations in a Low-Malaria-Transmission Zone in the Sudanian Region of Senegal.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Significant progress in malaria control has been achieved through long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), raising hopes for malaria elimination. However, emerging insecticide resistance threatens these gains. This study assessed the susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations to public health insecticides, examined the frequencies of kdr, Ace-1, and N1575Y mutations, and explored their associations with phenotypic resistance in Dielmo and Ndiop, Senegal.
Methods
Anopheles larvae collected between September and December 2022 were reared to adulthood. Adult mosquitoes were exposed to discriminating concentrations of various insecticides following WHO guidelines. Knockdown times (KDT50 and KDT95) for pyrethroids were calculated using the Probit model. RT-qPCR detected target-site mutations (kdr: L1014F and L1014S, Ace-1, N1575Y) and assessed correlations with phenotypic resistance. Species-specific PCR identified species within the An. gambiae complex. Results/
Conclusions
The populations of Dielmo and Ndiop showed susceptibility to pirimiphos-methyl and bendiocarb, with no Ace-1 mutation detected. Resistance to DDT and pyrethroids was observed. The knockdown times indicated that alphacypermethrin and lambdacyhalothrin were more effective than permethrin and deltamethrin. The L1014F allele was widespread, while L1014S was absent in Ndiop and low in Dielmo. The N1575Y mutation occurred only in populations with L1014F. The L1014S mutation was significantly associated with resistance to lambdacyhalothrin in both villages and to deltamethrin in Ndiop.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.