Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2015
Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saisho Hiroyuki, Arinaga Koichi, Kikusaki Satoshi, Hirata Yuichiro, Wada Kumiko, Kakuma Tatsuyuki, Tanaka Hiroyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In most patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) function, but some patients will not have favorable remodeling. Our objectives were to review long term clinical results of AVR for AR and to examine what factors affect the normalization of LV function after AVR for chronic AR.
METHODS: Between 1989 and 2010, 177 patients underwent isolated AVR for chronic pure AR. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on indexed end-systolic LV diameter (iESD): Group L (iESD) ≥25 mm/m(2)) (130 patients) and Group S (iESD <25 mm/m(2)) (47 patients).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in late mortality, freedom from cardiac-related death and rehospitalization for heart failure at late follow up after operation. At postoperative follow-up, 16% of patients had not recovered normal LV systolic function. By means of multivariate analysis, iESD and cardiac index (CI) were independent predictors of recovery of LV function and iESD >26.7 mm/m(2) and CI <2.71 l/min/m(2) were the best cut-off values.
CONCLUSIONS: Early and late surgical results of AVR for chronic AR were good, but for the preservation of postoperative normal LV function, AVR for AR patients should be performed before iESD reaches 26.7 mm/m(2).
METHODS: Between 1989 and 2010, 177 patients underwent isolated AVR for chronic pure AR. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on indexed end-systolic LV diameter (iESD): Group L (iESD) ≥25 mm/m(2)) (130 patients) and Group S (iESD <25 mm/m(2)) (47 patients).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in late mortality, freedom from cardiac-related death and rehospitalization for heart failure at late follow up after operation. At postoperative follow-up, 16% of patients had not recovered normal LV systolic function. By means of multivariate analysis, iESD and cardiac index (CI) were independent predictors of recovery of LV function and iESD >26.7 mm/m(2) and CI <2.71 l/min/m(2) were the best cut-off values.
CONCLUSIONS: Early and late surgical results of AVR for chronic AR were good, but for the preservation of postoperative normal LV function, AVR for AR patients should be performed before iESD reaches 26.7 mm/m(2).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve InsufficiencyBody Mass IndexChronic DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityStroke VolumeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyVentricular Function, Left