Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2014
Transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves: a single Australian Centre experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Subban Vijayakumar, Savage Michael, Crowhurst James, Poon Karl, Incani Alexander, Aroney Constantine, Tesar Peter, Clarke Andrew, Raffel Christopher, Murdoch Dale, Platts David, Burstow Darryl, Saireddy Ramakrishna, Bett Nicholas, Walters Darren L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with degenerated surgical bioprosthetic valves may be at high risk for further surgery because of age, comorbidities and the difficulties of repeat procedures. Percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation offers what may be a simpler and safer procedure.
METHODS: From May 2009 to March 2014 at the Prince Charles Hospital 1625 patients underwent surgical aortic valve replacement while 262 underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Twelve patients had valve-in-valve implants for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves.
RESULTS: These implants were deployed successfully without major valvular or paravalvular regurgitation. There were no periprocedural deaths, myocardial infarcts, neurological events or major vascular complications. Two patients died after 1624 and 1319days. Median survival for the remainder is 581days; they are stable with New York Heart Association class I/II functional status although 4 have a degree of patient-prosthesis mismatch, one has moderate aortic regurgitation and one required surgery for a late aortic dissection.
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is safe and effective treatment for patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves for whom reoperation is considered to be hazardous.
METHODS: From May 2009 to March 2014 at the Prince Charles Hospital 1625 patients underwent surgical aortic valve replacement while 262 underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Twelve patients had valve-in-valve implants for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves.
RESULTS: These implants were deployed successfully without major valvular or paravalvular regurgitation. There were no periprocedural deaths, myocardial infarcts, neurological events or major vascular complications. Two patients died after 1624 and 1319days. Median survival for the remainder is 581days; they are stable with New York Heart Association class I/II functional status although 4 have a degree of patient-prosthesis mismatch, one has moderate aortic regurgitation and one required surgery for a late aortic dissection.
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is safe and effective treatment for patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves for whom reoperation is considered to be hazardous.