Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2006
Stimulation of the motor cortex for disabling essential tremor.
Клинический случайСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lyons Kelly E, Wilkinson Steven B, Pahwa Rajesh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of targeted stimulation of the motor cortex as a treatment for essential tremor (ET).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the University of Kansas Medical Center, two patients with essential tremor received stimulation of the (contralateral) motor cortex using an investigational implantable pulse generator (IPG). Patients were evaluated with the Fahn Tolosa Marin tremor rating scale (TRS) at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks after surgery, both with stimulation turned on and turned off. Both patients also received neuropsychological assessments at baseline and again after surgery.
RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 75-year-old male with tremor for 20 years. His baseline total TRS score was 61 and his TRS 1 month after surgery was 57. His IPG was set at 30 Hz, 3 mA and 250 micros pulse width. Patient 2 was a 60-year-old male with tremor for over 10 years. His baseline total TRS was 47 and it was 43, 1 month after surgery. His IPG was set at 50 Hz, 5 mA and 250 micros pulse width. There were no adverse effects.
CONCLUSION: Cortical stimulation of the primary hand motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand was ineffective for the treatment of ET with the stimulation parameters used in this study. Future research examining other stimulation parameters is necessary to determine if there is a role for cortical stimulation in the treatment of ET.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the University of Kansas Medical Center, two patients with essential tremor received stimulation of the (contralateral) motor cortex using an investigational implantable pulse generator (IPG). Patients were evaluated with the Fahn Tolosa Marin tremor rating scale (TRS) at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks after surgery, both with stimulation turned on and turned off. Both patients also received neuropsychological assessments at baseline and again after surgery.
RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 75-year-old male with tremor for 20 years. His baseline total TRS score was 61 and his TRS 1 month after surgery was 57. His IPG was set at 30 Hz, 3 mA and 250 micros pulse width. Patient 2 was a 60-year-old male with tremor for over 10 years. His baseline total TRS was 47 and it was 43, 1 month after surgery. His IPG was set at 50 Hz, 5 mA and 250 micros pulse width. There were no adverse effects.
CONCLUSION: Cortical stimulation of the primary hand motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand was ineffective for the treatment of ET with the stimulation parameters used in this study. Future research examining other stimulation parameters is necessary to determine if there is a role for cortical stimulation in the treatment of ET.