MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3988/jcn.2005.1.1.76

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2005

Relationship between essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction according to age.

Lim Eui-Seong, Seo Man-Wook, Woo Seong-Ryong, Jeong Suk-Young, Jeong Seul-Ki

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The cerebellum and its neural circuitry have been assumed to play a major role in the pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET). In this study, we sought to find associations between ET and cerebellar dysfunction.

METHODS

We performed tandem gait test in 41 ET patients and 44 age-matched controls. Investigators assessed tandem gait by counting the number of missteps during ten-step tandem walk and each subject repeated the trial three times.

RESULTS

ET patients had a higher average and total numbers of missteps during tandem gait tests than control subjects (p<0.05). Sex-adjusted odds ratio of the association between tandem gait abnormality and ET was 3.40 (95% confidence intervals 1.06-10.85). According to age stratification, aged ET patients (age >/=70 years) showed significantly higher prevalence of tandem gait abnormality than young ones. Interaction terms determined by a likelihood ratio test was also statistically significant (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dysfunction of cerebellar neural circuitry may be associated with the pathophysiological mechanism of ET. In addition, aging may be an important factor modifying the association.

Для цитирования: Lim Eui-Seong, Seo Man-Wook, Woo Seong-Ryong, Jeong Suk-Young, Jeong Seul-Ki. Relationship between essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction according to age.. Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea). 2005. DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2005.1.1.76.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.