MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-66899-6

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2020

A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI.

Bosi Giorgia M, Capelli Claudio, Cheang Mun Hong, Delahunty Nicola, Mullen Michael, Taylor Andrew M, Schievano Silvia

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) still presents complications: paravalvular leakage (PVL) and onset of conduction abnormalities leading to permanent pacemaker implantation. Our aim was testing a validated patient-specific computational framework for prediction of TAVI outcomes and possible complications. Twenty-eight TAVI patients (14 SapienXT and 14 CoreValve) were retrospectively selected. Pre-procedural CT images were post-processed to create 3D patient-specific implantation sites. The procedures were simulated with finite element analysis. Simulations' results were compared against post-procedural clinical fluoroscopy and echocardiography images. The computational model was in good agreement with clinical findings: the overall stent diameter difference was 2.6% and PVL was correctly identified with a post-processing algorithm in 83% of cases. Strains in the implantation site were studied to assess the risk of conduction system disturbance and were found highest in the patient who required pacemaker implantation. This study suggests that computational tool could support safe planning and broadening of TAVI.

Для цитирования: Bosi Giorgia M, Capelli Claudio, Cheang Mun Hong, Delahunty Nicola, Mullen Michael, Taylor Andrew M, Schievano Silvia. A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI.. Scientific reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66899-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.