Seminars in ophthalmology · 2024
Anatomical and Functional Results of Early or Late Switching from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant in Case of Poor Anatomical Response in Naïve Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yozgat Zübeyir, Işik Mehmed Uğur
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of early or late switching from intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to IV Dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.
METHODS: This study included 68 eyes of 68 treatment-naïve BRVO patients who started anti-VEGF treatment. After the loading dose, the patients were divided into two groups: Early DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 3 loading doses) and Late DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 6 months). Visual acuity and examination findings were recorded at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month follow-ups. Optical coherence tomography data were recorded for central macular subfield thickness assessment.
RESULTS: A total of 30 (44.1%) women and 38 (55.9%) men participated, and the average age was 67.6 ± 6.4 years. The mean letter gains at week 52 was 15.1 and 20.9 in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. The group with the highest gain of ≥15 letters was the Late DEX group (26/34 patients) and the gain of ≥15 letters was 14/34 in the Early DEX group (p: 0.006). At week 52, the anatomical gain was 115.3 µm and 136.9 µm in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A gain of 15 or more letters was demonstrated to be higher in patients who switched to DEX implant late after anti-VEGF treatment. If it is necessary to switch, the late switch may be more effective for more visual gain at the end of the first year.
METHODS: This study included 68 eyes of 68 treatment-naïve BRVO patients who started anti-VEGF treatment. After the loading dose, the patients were divided into two groups: Early DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 3 loading doses) and Late DEX group (n:34) (DEX implant treatment started after 6 months). Visual acuity and examination findings were recorded at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month follow-ups. Optical coherence tomography data were recorded for central macular subfield thickness assessment.
RESULTS: A total of 30 (44.1%) women and 38 (55.9%) men participated, and the average age was 67.6 ± 6.4 years. The mean letter gains at week 52 was 15.1 and 20.9 in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively. The group with the highest gain of ≥15 letters was the Late DEX group (26/34 patients) and the gain of ≥15 letters was 14/34 in the Early DEX group (p: 0.006). At week 52, the anatomical gain was 115.3 µm and 136.9 µm in the Early DEX and Late DEX groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A gain of 15 or more letters was demonstrated to be higher in patients who switched to DEX implant late after anti-VEGF treatment. If it is necessary to switch, the late switch may be more effective for more visual gain at the end of the first year.