MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016103

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2017

Is one-stop surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome safe? A retrospective long-term follow-up study in a neurosurgical unit in Copenhagen.

Jørgensen Louise Møller, Piil Karin, Bashir Asma, Larsen Morten Bo, Poggenborg Pamela Santiago, Bjørck Sebastian, Fugleholm Kåre

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate one-stop surgery (OSS) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) regarding symptom relief and patient satisfaction. OSS in our setting means only one visit to the hospital for surgery and no hospital appointments for preassessment or follow-up. We hypothesised that relief of symptoms with OSS is comparable with that in non-OSS patients reported in the literature.

DESIGN

This is a long-term retrospective follow-up study (56.5 months) of 1003 patients referred for CTS and discharged with or without surgery from an OSS clinic. Of the original cohort, 671 patients completed the long-term follow-up telephone interview.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the patients were free of even minor symptoms following surgery. The symptom relief and patient satisfaction in this study were comparable with results in non-OSS patients reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a clinical pathway and OSS for the management of CTS was safe with good long-term symptom relief and high patient satisfaction.

Для цитирования: Jørgensen Louise Møller, Piil Karin, Bashir Asma, Larsen Morten Bo, Poggenborg Pamela Santiago, Bjørck Sebastian, Fugleholm Kåre. Is one-stop surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome safe? A retrospective long-term follow-up study in a neurosurgical unit in Copenhagen.. BMJ open. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016103.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.