Circulation · 2006
Outcome after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sacher Frédéric, Probst Vincent, Iesaka Yoshito, Jacon Peggy, Laborderie Julien, Mizon-Gérard Frédérique, Mabo Philippe, Reuter Sylvain, Lamaison Dominique, Takahashi Yoshihide, O'Neill Mark D, Garrigue Stéphane, Pierre Bertrand, Jaïs Pierre, Pasquié Jean-Luc, Hocini Mélèze, Salvador-Mazenq Michèle, Nogami Akihiko, Amiel Alain, Defaye Pascal, Bordachar Pierre, Boveda Serge, Maury Philippe, Klug Didier, Babuty Dominique, Haïssaguerre Michel, Mansourati Jacques, Clémenty Jacques, Le Marec Hervé
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease characterized by an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by ventricular fibrillation. At present, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the recommended therapy in high-risk patients. This multicenter study reports the outcome of a large series of patients implanted with an ICD for Brugada syndrome.
METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients (n=220, 46+/-12 years, 183 male) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an ICD in 14 centers between 1993 and 2005 were investigated. ICD indication was based on resuscitated SCD (18 patients, 8%), syncope (88 patients, 40%), or positive electrophysiological study in asymptomatic patients (99 patients, 45%). The remaining 15 patients received an ICD because of a family history of SCD or nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia. During a mean follow-up of 38+/-27 months, no patient died and 18 patients (8%) had appropriate device therapy (10+/-15 shocks/patient, 26+/-33 months after implantation). The complication rate was 28%, including inappropriate shocks, which occurred in 45 patients (20%, 4+/-3 shocks/patient, 21+/-20 months after implantation). The reasons for inappropriate therapy were lead failure (19 patients), T-wave oversensing (10 patients), sinus tachycardia (10 patients), and supraventricular tachycardia (9 patients). Among implantation parameters, high defibrillation threshold, high pacing threshold, and low R-wave amplitude occurred, respectively, in 12%, 27%, and 15% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large Brugada syndrome population, a low incidence of arrhythmic events was found, with an annual event rate of 2.6% during a follow-up of >3 years, in addition to a significant risk of device-related complications (8.9%/year). Inappropriate shocks were 2.5 times more frequent than appropriate ones.
METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients (n=220, 46+/-12 years, 183 male) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an ICD in 14 centers between 1993 and 2005 were investigated. ICD indication was based on resuscitated SCD (18 patients, 8%), syncope (88 patients, 40%), or positive electrophysiological study in asymptomatic patients (99 patients, 45%). The remaining 15 patients received an ICD because of a family history of SCD or nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia. During a mean follow-up of 38+/-27 months, no patient died and 18 patients (8%) had appropriate device therapy (10+/-15 shocks/patient, 26+/-33 months after implantation). The complication rate was 28%, including inappropriate shocks, which occurred in 45 patients (20%, 4+/-3 shocks/patient, 21+/-20 months after implantation). The reasons for inappropriate therapy were lead failure (19 patients), T-wave oversensing (10 patients), sinus tachycardia (10 patients), and supraventricular tachycardia (9 patients). Among implantation parameters, high defibrillation threshold, high pacing threshold, and low R-wave amplitude occurred, respectively, in 12%, 27%, and 15% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large Brugada syndrome population, a low incidence of arrhythmic events was found, with an annual event rate of 2.6% during a follow-up of >3 years, in addition to a significant risk of device-related complications (8.9%/year). Inappropriate shocks were 2.5 times more frequent than appropriate ones.