Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
The Graduated Embryo Score of Embryos from Infertile Women with and without Peritoneal Endometriosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Caran Juliana, Genro Vanessa Krebs, Souza Carlos Augusto Bastos de, Cunha-Filho João Sabino
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine embryo quality (mean graduated embryo score [GES]) in infertile patients with endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer (IVF-ET) compared with infertile patients without endometriosis.
METHODS: A case-control study was performed comparing 706 embryos (162 patients) divided into 2 groups: 472 embryos derived from patients without endometriosis (n = 109, infertile patients with tubal infertility) and 234 embryos from patients in the study group (n = 53, infertile patients with peritoneal endometriosis). All patients were subjected to IVF using an oestradiol-antagonist-recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) protocol for ovarian stimulation. The mean GES was performed to evaluate all embryos at 3 points in time: 16 to 18 hours, 25 to 27 hours, and 64 to 67 hours. Embryo evaluation was performed according to the following parameters: fragmentation, nucleolar alignment, polar body apposition, blastomere number/morphology, and symmetry. The primary outcome measure was the mean GES score. We also compared fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: Although the number of embryos transferred was greater in patients with endometriosis than in the control group (2.38 ± 0.66 versus 2.15 ± 0.54; p = 0.001), the mean GES was similar in both groups (71 ± 19.8 versus 71.9 ± 23.5; p = 0.881). Likewise, the fertilization rate was similar in all groups, being 61% in patients with endometriosis and 59% in the control group (p = 0.511). No significant differences were observed in the implantation (21% versus 22%; [p = 0.989]) and pregnancy rates (26.4% versus 28.4%; p = 0.989).
CONCLUSION: Embryo quality measured by the mean GES was not influenced by peritoneal endometriosis. Likewise, the evaluated reproductive outcomes were similar between infertile patients with and without endometriosis.
METHODS: A case-control study was performed comparing 706 embryos (162 patients) divided into 2 groups: 472 embryos derived from patients without endometriosis (n = 109, infertile patients with tubal infertility) and 234 embryos from patients in the study group (n = 53, infertile patients with peritoneal endometriosis). All patients were subjected to IVF using an oestradiol-antagonist-recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) protocol for ovarian stimulation. The mean GES was performed to evaluate all embryos at 3 points in time: 16 to 18 hours, 25 to 27 hours, and 64 to 67 hours. Embryo evaluation was performed according to the following parameters: fragmentation, nucleolar alignment, polar body apposition, blastomere number/morphology, and symmetry. The primary outcome measure was the mean GES score. We also compared fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: Although the number of embryos transferred was greater in patients with endometriosis than in the control group (2.38 ± 0.66 versus 2.15 ± 0.54; p = 0.001), the mean GES was similar in both groups (71 ± 19.8 versus 71.9 ± 23.5; p = 0.881). Likewise, the fertilization rate was similar in all groups, being 61% in patients with endometriosis and 59% in the control group (p = 0.511). No significant differences were observed in the implantation (21% versus 22%; [p = 0.989]) and pregnancy rates (26.4% versus 28.4%; p = 0.989).
CONCLUSION: Embryo quality measured by the mean GES was not influenced by peritoneal endometriosis. Likewise, the evaluated reproductive outcomes were similar between infertile patients with and without endometriosis.