DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.03.020
Utility and Limitations of Ablation Index for Guiding Therapy in Ventricular Myocardium.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Ablation index (AI) is used for guiding therapy during pulmonary vein isolation. However, its potential utility in ventricular myocardium is unknown.
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to examine the correlation between AI and lesion dimensions in healthy and infarcted ventricles.
METHODS
In ex vivo experiments using healthy swine ventricles, the correlation between AI (400-1,200) and lesion dimensions was examined at fixed power (30 W) and contact force (CF) (15 g). To examine the accuracy of AI in predicting lesion dimensions created by different combinations of ablation parameters, applications with a similar prespecified AI value created using different power (30 vs 40 W), CF (15 vs 25 g) or impedance (130-170 Ω) were created. In in vivo experiments, the correlation between AI and lesion dimensions was examined in healthy and infarcted myocardium.
RESULTS
Ex vivo experiments (247 lesions, 36 hearts) showed good correlation between AI and lesion depth (R = 0.93; P < 0.001). However, in vivo experiments (9 healthy swine and 10 infarcted swine) showed moderate correlation in healthy myocardium (R = 0.64; P < 0.01) and poor correlation in infarcted myocardium (R = 0.23; P = 0.61). AI values achieved using different combinations of power, CF, and baseline impedance resulted in different lesion depths: Ablation at 30 W produced deeper lesions compared with 40 W, ablation with CF of 15 g produced deeper lesions compared with CF of 25 g, and ablation at lower impedance produced larger lesions at similar prespecified AI values (P < 0.01 for all).
CONCLUSIONS
AI has limited value for guiding ablation in ventricular myocardium, particularly scar. This may be related to small proportional significance of application duration and complex tissue architecture.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.