International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2006
The impact of the CERAD-NP on diagnosis of cognitive deficiencies in late onset depression and Alzheimer's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Künig Gabriella, Jäger Michael, Stief Volker, Kaldune Andreas, Urbaniok Frank, Endrass Jerome
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify the most appropriate test combination for distinguishing between late onset depression (LOD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). To achieve this objective, the Consortium to Establish a Register for Alzheimer's Disease-Neuropsychological Battery (CERAD-NP) data of patients diagnosed with these two conditions were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.
METHODS: In the first regression analysis, the following CERAD-NP subtests were included: verbal fluency, Boston naming test, word list learning, constructional praxis, word list recall, and constructional praxis recall. In a second regression analysis, only CERAD-NP memory parameters were included: word list learning, word list recall, word list intrusions, word list savings, word list recognition, word list false positive errors, constructional praxis recall, and constructional praxis savings.
RESULTS: The combination of word list recall and constructional praxis recall best distinguished between LOD and AD, with a ROC of 0.91. In the stepwise regression of memory measures, word list recall, word list savings, and constructional praxis recall was the best combination, resulting in a ROC of 0.92.
CONCLUSION: The most efficacious combination of the CERAD-NP battery for discriminating between LOD and AD consisted of word list recall and constructional praxis recall. Of the CERAD-NP memory measures, word list recall, word list savings, and constructional praxis recall represented the best diagnostic combination.
METHODS: In the first regression analysis, the following CERAD-NP subtests were included: verbal fluency, Boston naming test, word list learning, constructional praxis, word list recall, and constructional praxis recall. In a second regression analysis, only CERAD-NP memory parameters were included: word list learning, word list recall, word list intrusions, word list savings, word list recognition, word list false positive errors, constructional praxis recall, and constructional praxis savings.
RESULTS: The combination of word list recall and constructional praxis recall best distinguished between LOD and AD, with a ROC of 0.91. In the stepwise regression of memory measures, word list recall, word list savings, and constructional praxis recall was the best combination, resulting in a ROC of 0.92.
CONCLUSION: The most efficacious combination of the CERAD-NP battery for discriminating between LOD and AD consisted of word list recall and constructional praxis recall. Of the CERAD-NP memory measures, word list recall, word list savings, and constructional praxis recall represented the best diagnostic combination.