Khirurgiia · 2026
[Augmented reality technology in various surgical fields].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Оригинал на русском
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panchenkov D N, Klimov D D, Grigorieva E V, Rasner P I, Liskevich R V, Reshetov D N, Manchurov V N, Shpitser I M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To summarize data on augmented reality technology in various surgical fields.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2022 and 2024, specialists in abdominal, interventional, maxillofacial, reconstructive and head & neck surgery, as well as urology performed augmented reality assisted treatment of 68 patients at the University Hospital of the Russian University of Medicine. This technology was used for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation.
RESULTS: Integration of augmented reality did not significantly prolong surgery time. In head and neck tumor surgery, augmented reality reduced surgery time by 15%. In interventional surgery, improved spatial understanding of vascular anatomy reduced fluoroscopy time and surgery time. Likert scale assessments confirmed high usability of this technology.
CONCLUSION: Augmented reality is effective and perspective in various surgical fields. However, this technology requires further refinement. Enhancing the precision of 3D models and spatial registration processes, improving adaptability to intraoperative anatomical shifts, and automating routine tasks will collectively increase versatility and adoption of augmented reality systems throughout surgical care.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2022 and 2024, specialists in abdominal, interventional, maxillofacial, reconstructive and head & neck surgery, as well as urology performed augmented reality assisted treatment of 68 patients at the University Hospital of the Russian University of Medicine. This technology was used for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation.
RESULTS: Integration of augmented reality did not significantly prolong surgery time. In head and neck tumor surgery, augmented reality reduced surgery time by 15%. In interventional surgery, improved spatial understanding of vascular anatomy reduced fluoroscopy time and surgery time. Likert scale assessments confirmed high usability of this technology.
CONCLUSION: Augmented reality is effective and perspective in various surgical fields. However, this technology requires further refinement. Enhancing the precision of 3D models and spatial registration processes, improving adaptability to intraoperative anatomical shifts, and automating routine tasks will collectively increase versatility and adoption of augmented reality systems throughout surgical care.