MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2014/9662.4882

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014

Giant inguinoscrotal hernia repaired by lichtensteins technique without loss of domain -a case report.

Hn Dinesh, Kumar Cd Jagadish, N Shreyas

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Giant inguinal hernia is a formidable surgical problem. It is defined as inguinal hernia extending up to mid thigh or below in standing position. Giant inguinal hernia is usually associated with compromised quality of life due to sexual discomfort and constant weight bearing. It is a challenge for the operating surgeon since it is rare. It may require multistage repair with recurrence being common. A 45-year-old male patient presented with Giant inguinal hernia and compromised quality of life due to pain and sexual discomfort. Lichtenstein's polypropylene mesh repair was done after reducing the sac contents (omentum and transverse colon) with partial omentectomy. There was no loss of intra-abdominal domain. Postoperative period was uneventful. In literature many techniques are available to increase the intra-abdominal cavity (a) Creating progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (b) Creation of ventral wall defect (c) surgical debulking of hernia contents. Recurrence is prevented by reconstruction of the abdominal wall using Marlex mesh and a Tensor fasciae lata flap. Laparoscopic repair is associated with more recurrence. Lichtenstein's technique is one of the preferred treatments.

Для цитирования: Hn Dinesh, Kumar Cd Jagadish, N Shreyas. Giant inguinoscrotal hernia repaired by lichtensteins technique without loss of domain -a case report.. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2014. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/9662.4882.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.