Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
Enhancing lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic drainage to vascularized lymph nodes with nanofibrillar collagen scaffolds.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Chin-Yu, Tinhofer Ines E, Nguyen Dung, Cheng Ming-Huei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of nanofibrillar collagen scaffold (BioBridge) implantation from the affected limb to the unaffected contralateral femoral vein or lymph node in a rat model.
METHODS: Hind limb lymphedema in Lewis rats was created with lymphadenectomy and inguinal circumcision without radiation. The volumetric difference (greater than 5%) using computed tomography and indocyanine green fluorescence evaluated the progress of lymphedema at 4 weeks. The lymphedema rats have separated into Group I: Controls; Group II: implanted BioBridge to the contralateral femoral vein; and Group III: implanted BioBridge to the contralateral inguinal lymph node.
RESULTS: A total of 14 of 30 (46.7%) rats developed hind limb lymphedema with a mean volume difference of 5.83 ± 0.99% and showed diffuse dermal backflow at 4 weeks postlymphadenectomy. Four weeks postimplantation of BioBridge, the mean volumetric difference was 5.62 ± 2.11%, 4.97 ± 0.59%, and -2.47 ± 2.37% in Group I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.05). The dermal backflow on the affected limb increased in Groups I and II but decreased in Group III.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of BioBridge from the affected limb to the contralateral inguinal lymph node significantly reduced the hind limb lymphedema at 4 weeks.
METHODS: Hind limb lymphedema in Lewis rats was created with lymphadenectomy and inguinal circumcision without radiation. The volumetric difference (greater than 5%) using computed tomography and indocyanine green fluorescence evaluated the progress of lymphedema at 4 weeks. The lymphedema rats have separated into Group I: Controls; Group II: implanted BioBridge to the contralateral femoral vein; and Group III: implanted BioBridge to the contralateral inguinal lymph node.
RESULTS: A total of 14 of 30 (46.7%) rats developed hind limb lymphedema with a mean volume difference of 5.83 ± 0.99% and showed diffuse dermal backflow at 4 weeks postlymphadenectomy. Four weeks postimplantation of BioBridge, the mean volumetric difference was 5.62 ± 2.11%, 4.97 ± 0.59%, and -2.47 ± 2.37% in Group I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.05). The dermal backflow on the affected limb increased in Groups I and II but decreased in Group III.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of BioBridge from the affected limb to the contralateral inguinal lymph node significantly reduced the hind limb lymphedema at 4 weeks.