Abdominal imaging · 1997
Sonographic assessment of the normal and abnormal bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pradel J A, David X R, Taourel P, Djafari M, Veyrac M, Bruel J M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the value of high resolution sonography (HRS) in identifying normal and inflammatory bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis by using a segment-by-segment analysis.
METHODS: Thirty-five HRS were performed in patients with nondiverticular inflammatory bowel disease, without knowledge of clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic data. HRS evaluated separately five intestinal segments (terminal ileum, cecum/ascending colon, transverse, descending colon, and sigmoid colon) and was considered positive for inflammation when wall thickness during compression exceeded 3 mm. We compared HRS findings with results of endoscopy or enteroclysis performed within 8 days of HRS; endoscopic and radiologic results were classified into two subgroups: mild inflammatory lesions and frank inflammatory lesions.
RESULTS: Segment-by-segment analysis resulted in an accuracy of 81%, a sensitivity of 70%, and a specificity of 93%. Sensitivity was significantly lower for mild lesions (52%) than for frank lesions (87%, p < .001). Of the 32 patients having an inflammatory bowel condition, 29 (91%) had at least one segment correctly identified as inflammatory by HRS.
CONCLUSION: Even if relatively insensitive for minor lesions, HRS is a promising, minimally invasive method for assessing normal and inflammatory bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis.
METHODS: Thirty-five HRS were performed in patients with nondiverticular inflammatory bowel disease, without knowledge of clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic data. HRS evaluated separately five intestinal segments (terminal ileum, cecum/ascending colon, transverse, descending colon, and sigmoid colon) and was considered positive for inflammation when wall thickness during compression exceeded 3 mm. We compared HRS findings with results of endoscopy or enteroclysis performed within 8 days of HRS; endoscopic and radiologic results were classified into two subgroups: mild inflammatory lesions and frank inflammatory lesions.
RESULTS: Segment-by-segment analysis resulted in an accuracy of 81%, a sensitivity of 70%, and a specificity of 93%. Sensitivity was significantly lower for mild lesions (52%) than for frank lesions (87%, p < .001). Of the 32 patients having an inflammatory bowel condition, 29 (91%) had at least one segment correctly identified as inflammatory by HRS.
CONCLUSION: Even if relatively insensitive for minor lesions, HRS is a promising, minimally invasive method for assessing normal and inflammatory bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis.