MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13047

Медицинская библиотека · Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology · 2014

[Examination of rumination and meaning making in stressful events: the influence of subjective evaluation of events and personal characteristics].

Kamijo Namiko, Yukawa Shintaro

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study examined the factors that influence meaning making and rumination related to stressful events. Six hypothetical scenarios were used, all of which were contextualized stressful events. Participants (N = 779) completed a questionnaire about one of the six scenarios, which assessed the possibility of preventing the event, the probability of the event occurring, the perceived threat of the event, the frequency of rumination, and meaning making. They completed a scale that assessed self-rumination and self-reflection as a way of thinking, and a scale that assessed executive function. Executive function and self-rumination were negatively correlated. Furthermore, self-rumination positively correlated with the frequency of rumination on the event. The perceived threat was high when the probability of the event occurring was low and the possibility of preventing the event was high. Although the perceived threat of the event inhibited meaning making, this was promoted by mediating the frequency of rumination. Self-reflection also directly promoted meaning making. Therefore, this study highlighted a number of factors that affect rumination and meaning making.

Для цитирования: Kamijo Namiko, Yukawa Shintaro. [Examination of rumination and meaning making in stressful events: the influence of subjective evaluation of events and personal characteristics].. Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology. 2014. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.